23.1.12

Snapshots of Istanbul


My favorite part of Istanbul was taking a late afternoon ferry to Buyukada, one of the Prince's Islands. The ride back, we sat on the floor of the top deck of the ferry and looked out onto a beautiful sunset, the Bosphorous and listened to Bon Iver.


You can't have an Istanbul album without a mention of the Grand Bazaar. It's far from off the beaten trail, but the Grand Bazaar has it's own charm. Besides the fact that there are beautiful photo opportunities.


22.1.12

Atheism 2.0











For some time now, I have been trying to paint a picture of my relationship with spirituality and religion. My Facebook information on religion reads - "Hindu/Haven't Figured It Out" and that has been the status quo for sometime now.

I was raised with the mythology and ritual of my traditional Hindu grandparents. In fact, my first language was Telugu - as spoken by the Pandavas and Kauravas of the ancient Indian epic, The Mahabharata, which at the time, had been televised as a hugely popular sitcom. At the age of 3, much to the amusement of my family, I would narrate in great detail the entire Mahabharata including all those long, complicated names that I can no longer make head or tail of. I sat down to all the requisite poojas, loved prasadam, enjoyed wearing the colorful pattu langas that accompanied any religious festivity and of course, the sense of peace and beauty of the small household altars decorated with incense, fresh flowers, tiny sugar cubes and rows of ants marching to and fro, perhaps also making their worship.

I went to a Montessori school in a church for the first three years of my formal schooling. There were 18 of us from K-5 grade with 3 teachers of rather liberal sentiment concerning spirituality(Tarsilla, Cheryl and Stephen's mom, lol) and who imparted to all their students an overwhelming sense of joy and wonder about the world that surrounded them. We sang the head teacher's favorite Christmas Carol every year, learnt science by hiking through local nature trails and observing tadpoles, birds, skunk cabbage and getting stuck in the mud. We celebrated Valentine's day by playing 'Hug, Hug, Kiss' (instead of Duck, Duck, Goose - which we played through the winter in the Church graveyard), celebrated Japanese New Year by eating rice and fish with our hands, put on a yearly Thanksgiving play, dyed Easter eggs at Easter, made home-made Pumpkin ice-cream in the Church kitchen at Hallowen, learnt about Bees and honey by tasting about 10 different types of honey from different flowers in the Springtime and ran a minor "coal mining" operation in the church backyard. There were never any overt religious dialogue or preaching, but looking back, this period feels like the most deeply religious of my life.

Religion was a part of my life in beautiful ways as a child. Since I was fortunate enough to have a magical childhood where I never really needed to pray to God for anything because I had everything - there was never even any room for disillusionment. Religion has always been a deep part of me, not for spiritual or mystical reasons, but for the simple idea that it has such positive and comforting associations.

That being said, the past few years of this so called 'adulthood' have made me realize that I absolutely do no believe in the existence of a particular entity called God. I believe in the Divine and the beautiful and the kind, whatever that is and wherever or however it is centered. I do believe that there is something greater than me and every other individual on this planet. I catch bits of that feeling when I listen to great music, read about a particular interesting aspect of physiology, stand outside in the sunshine or look at a little baby smiling. But to attribute the beauty of all of those things to the greatness of 'God' seems a little simplistic and frankly, a little insulting. Not insulting - I can't find the word - but somehow it seems to detract from the beauty of those objects.

When people ask me what religion I follow I have been apt to say Hindu, because Hinduism in it's purest form allows for freedom of interpretation with respect to the exact definition of God. I have not really pushed to define myself religiously. Because I consider some of Atheistic argument just as reactionary and pointless as hardline religious people. I have always felt, but never ever really expressed, that a synthesis of the two and personal freedom somehow allied to a sense of community would be the strongest scaffolding on which to build my life. However, I've never really found such a philosophy articulated well. As the above video describes, I've always felt rather squeamish about the doctrine that surrounds the ritualism that I sometimes find comforting and the seeming harshness in using absolute rationality as a guide to my life.

Atheism 2.0 as explained in the video above is the best expression of many of the things I feel personally. It is almost an anthropological approach to the construction of a scaffolding from which to reach new heights of personal growth and development.

Perhaps it's a result of growing up in plenty, but I like when I'm told that I don't have to compromise, that I can have the best of both worlds - because there are so many, and they're never 'hermetically sealed'.

Maybe, I've found my religion.

18.1.12

12.1.12

Book Review Time

India: A PortraitIndia: A Portrait by Patrick French

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


Patrick French's 'India' is the only non-fiction book on India that I have ever finished.

I've tried reading John Keay's 'India: A History', Mark Tully's 'No Full Stops in India' and even some Dalrymple, but have never been able to get beyond the first half.

Perhaps, poised as I am to leave this country in a few short months, Patrick French's book was extremely topical.

All that aside, I truly loved this book. Patrick French's point of view on India is that of an outsider who has spent years getting to know and love this country. He is on the inside enough to understand the multitude of cultural idiosyncrasies that almost define this country without being entrenched and unable to see the humor and absurdity of life in India. Although he is Britisher, he does not approach his writing with nationalistic loyalties, but a curious observer of a nation of curiosities.

This approach, I feel, is what makes 'India: An Intimate Biography of 1.2 Billion People' - the contradiction in the title resonates as a theme through the entire book - a page turner. I literally, could not put the book down and found myself reading about the economic history and development of India while I brushed my teeth.

I have not read much non-fiction, so I suppose I'm not qualified to really pass judgement on Patrick French's skill as a writer, but I think that this man has the quiet brilliance (of HTC - haha, just kidding) that is the mark of a great mind. He has the ability to discuss the technicalities of economics and politics without becoming too pedantic and always keeping in mind the contextual, human story that drives political and economic change. I believe that his understanding of society, that it is nothing more than a collection of human beings bound together, loosely, by random historical, cultural and economic events, really frames the way he understands India. And he never, just as he discusses later in the book, falls prey to the Western impulse of categorizing and defining India by rules that have no meaning in it's context.

Patrick French's 'India', is a balanced and ultimately optimistic account of a country's modern history that places you in a much better position to understand the India. As an introduction to non-fiction literature on this country, I would say this book is pretty much perfect. It is a page turner, contains enough anecdotes that are entirely relatable and is sufficiently factual and technical to feed your intellect. For more advanced readers, it may not be a sophisticated or analytical enough account, but for me, it was just perfect. Finishing the book felt as heartbreaking as it will to leave the country two months from now.





View all my reviews

29.12.11

XX

Dimensions of Balance in Women's Lives
Maureen A. Mahoney, Ph.D.
International Conference of Women, Business and Society
Madrid, Spain, April 3, 2006

I was thrilled, back in January, to be invited to participate in this conference. In February, as I drove back and forth to work and at other random moments, I enjoyed contemplating what I would say about the challenges women face in defining success for themselves. In March, the enjoyment began to be replaced with anxiety about how I would ever carve out a few consecutive hours to commit my thoughts to paper, polish them, and have something worthy of this gathering in time for the meeting.

It did not take me long to realize that this progression from anticipated pleasure in a task near to one's heart to anxiety about time to accomplish it symbolizes a theme of this conference. How do accomplished, ambitious, professional women, who also have family obligations, find the time to reflect on our lives and reassess periodically what is in balance, what is out of balance, and, even more deeply, what matters to us the most? A cacophony of external voices sets expectations for success; for women, the freedom to choose what suits us has always been deeply constrained by a confluence of social structures rife with contradictions. Even for those of us who resist, and I would say that this audience is filled with resisters, we experience external expectations as guilt. We are always in doubt about whether we can be successful in our personal lives as well as our work lives. Will our relationships and children suffer if we are ambitious in our careers? Will our careers suffer when our family obligations require us to miss meetings and decline travel? We are so exhausted by carrying out our obligations and worrying about their consequences for our families and our careers that we rarely take time to assess whether we are reaching our goals. Indeed, we often lose track of whether we have goals of our own at all.

That we are in this predicament is the result of long and difficult social change in which women's rights to pursue careers have been forged. I am Dean at Smith College, the largest all-women's private college in the United States. Since 1875, Smith has been a destination for young women who desire to make a difference in the world. Only the best and the brightest are accepted. Our graduates have been pioneers in the professions since Smith was founded in 1875. But as recently as fifty years ago, we were also in the business of producing accomplished wives and helpmates for the male graduates of Harvard and Yale. It was in the mid-1950's and early 1960's that two distinguished Smith alumnae published books that addressed the conundrum of definitions of success for women.

One book, Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963), fueled a nascent women's liberation movement in the United States which inspired increasing numbers of middle class American women to follow their own ambitions rather than, or in addition to, supporting their husbands. Friedan argued that women could only be truly fulfilled if they pursued careers. If we adopted the "feminine mystique" of domestic arts and devoted ourselves to the support of husband and children, Friedan argued, we became depressed, dissatisfied, restless and unfulfilled.

Today, more than seventy percent of American women with children work outside the home, driven, of course, not only by their desire to work, but also by economic necessity. Are they happy and fulfilled? Do they count themselves successful? There is no doubt that they are devoting themselves to their children as well as their careers. Recent studies in the U.S. find that working women are spending more time with their children than stay-at-home moms did in 1975. This is only possible because they are sleeping less. And it is taking a toll: the front page of the March 2nd New York Times carries an article with the headline "Stretched to Limit, Women Stall March to Work." Yet work is not now a choice for most women: it takes a two-income household to maintain a middle class lifestyle in the United States.

In answering Betty Friedan's call to work, we have found a sense of accomplishment. Our children enjoy as much time with us as they did thirty years ago. But how do we locate our own goals in the midst of these demands? A second, much quieter book by Smith alumna Anne Morrow Lindbergh (indeed, Charles Lindbergh's wife) was published only a few years before The Feminine Mystique. In Gift from the Sea (1955) Lindbergh does not advocate radical social change: rather, she suggests that the complications of work and family are inevitable and to be accepted as part of the fabric of our lives. Lindbergh did have a radical notion, however: that women need time periodically to sit quietly and reflect on the inner life that holds these tensions in balance.

In Gift from the Sea, a meditation on self and solitude, Lindbergh writes "the problem is not merely one of Woman and Career, Woman and the Home, Woman and Independence. It is more basically: how to remain whole in the midst of the distractions of life; how to remain balanced no matter what centrifugal forces tend to pull one off center; how to remain strong, no matter what shocks come in at the periphery and tend to crack the hub of the wheel." (p.23) Lindbergh suggests the answer is building solitude into our lives so that we have time to think systematically about these matters. She writes, "if women were convinced that a day off or an hour of solitude was a reasonable ambition, they would find a way of attaining it. As it is, they feel so unjustified in their demand that they rarely make the attempt." But, in an observation that is perhaps more timely now than when she first wrote it, even when we find such moments, we are unskilled at taking advantage of them. "Instead of planting our solitude with our own dream blossoms, we choke the space with continuous chatter and companionship to which we do not even listen....When the noise stops, there is no inner music to take its place. We must re-learn to be alone." (p. 36) I read this book fifty years after it was written, and it resonates so deeply for me that I am nearly brought to tears.

I am a product of the women's liberation movement that Betty Friedan started. My expectations for my own success have been shaped by it: I never doubted that I would pursue a career as well as a family. But this was an inchoate ambition, completely non-specific about how I would manage to achieve these goals. I earned a PhD in psychology in 1977 and started my first full time job as an assistant professor at the same time. I have been working full time ever since. In the midst of it all, I was married in 1976 to a man who was proud of my accomplishments but also enjoyed the dinners I cooked every night. We had a daughter in 1981. Our jobs were in cities two hours apart. We lived in between, separated from friends in both locations. Our daughter was in day care where we lived, an hour and a half from my work and an hour from his. I used every ounce of my energy commuting every day, giving 100 percent to my job, and worrying about whether I would be home in time to pick my daughter up before the daycare center closed. This pace took a toll on my marriage; my husband and I divorced just as my daughter turned five. After my divorce, I moved to the town where I work. Eventually, I got married again, to a wonderful man who is a much better cook than I am and prepares dinner for me every night.

I only had one child, who is now 24 and flourishing in her own life. But even without the responsibility of a young child at home, and even with a husband who does all the cooking, I remain busier than I have ever been. I love my work but I despair sometimes when I look at my daily calendar and see that I do not have even 15 minutes to gather my thoughts between meetings that are scheduled from 8am to 8pm.

I see that my daughter suffers from the same exhausting busy-ness in her job as a teacher, and she does not yet have children of her own. I see students at Smith College with appointment books that are nearly as packed as mine. The question that Anne Morrow Lindbergh raised in such a different context fifty years ago persists: How to remain whole in the midst of the demands of work and family. The missing piece is not only sleep. It is time to sit quietly and think; to reflect deeply on one's life, one's goals and one's understanding of success in the various dimensions of human experience.

It is to provide opportunities for reflection that Smith College is launching a new program for our students and alumnae. We want to educate women about the importance of developing a habit of self-reflection and we want to give permission to our alumnae to incorporate self-reflection as a legitimate ambition in their lives. Called the "Women's Narratives of Success Project," we will offer week-long workshops for undergraduates and shorter workshops for alumnae in which we provide structured opportunities to think through the dimensions of success and balance in life. We use the concept of narrative because we understand these reflections as stories that each woman tells for herself. We also know that the stories change as life circumstances change, so we build in the opportunity for recasting the narrative: one's story of success when one is 50 may be very different from one's story at age 20.

Work goals and family goals will be at the heart of the project: what kind of work and how much? One of the most perplexing problems for young women is deciding on a career path that suits them. Exploring with them the intersection between their unique interests, training and talents will be at the heart of the workshops. Definitions of success also entail one's financial goals and how one's career will meet them. It is our sense that women, especially young women, do not pay much attention to this issue, and it is only when they are divorced or widowed that the urgency of financial independence becomes acute. We must also ask how much financial success is enough? In the words of Laura Nash, at the Harvard Business School, it is important to discover how much is "just enough" to reach one's goals and allow pursuits other than money to enter into one's life as well.

We will raise the theme of family and suggest it is a choice, not a destiny. Does one want a lasting partnership in the form of a marriage or other commitment? How does one think about success in this regard? Does one want children? Will one work outside the home when children are young? How does one make the decision to sacrifice work for relationships or relationships for work? How do friendships figure in a life and how does one sustain them?

The project explicitly expands concepts of success to take account of life goals beyond work and family. How does one incorporate one's ethical values into one's life? How does one contemplate one's social responsibility and the legacy one leaves behind? Again, how much is enough?

Finally how does one replenish oneself in the midst of the competing demands one sets oneself? Do you value leisure? Do you ensure that you laugh and have fun? How do you look after your health and wellness? Do you build into your life a habit of exercise? How do you manage stress? More deeply, how should creativity and the arts figure in your life? What are the dimensions of creativity that infuse a life and sustain it?

Every person who contemplates these choices must confront the question of desire: are the goals I identify my own, or are they motivated by a need to fulfill the expectations of family, teachers, mentors and friends? Each workshop will provide structured opportunities for participants to examine family legacies and narratives of success. What stories have been told in one's family about "successful" women and how do these stories become embedded in one's own assumptions and expectations?

In addition to workshops and discussion, we plan to use electronic-portfolios so that each participant can rewrite her life story after she leaves the workshop. Workshops for alumnae will explore the way life experiences shape and change understandings of success. We expect to develop an electronic communication network so that women can share their narratives of success and our students and alumnae can learn from each other.

Ultimately, the goal is for women to experience themselves as agents of their own lives in the midst of intense pressures urging them in one direction or another. We hope to instill a lifelong habit of reflection, a practice that helps us locate and relocate ourselves on the multiple dimensions of success. We embark on this project not so much because we are experts in achieving these goals ourselves, but rather because we have failed at them. My own life has been immensely satisfying as I step back and look at the broad outlines. My own mother did not go to college and she did not work outside the home. I take pride in my education and my work. I am grateful for a supportive husband who knows who I am and takes as much satisfaction from my accomplishments as I do. I am wildly proud of my daughter. But I cannot say that all this happened because I took time to think through my own definitions of success as I moved from one stage of my life to the next. The price I have paid is not told by the meta-story of what I have done. The price is in the persistent experience I still have of facing too many responsibilities and having too little time to reflect on my priorities and ultimate goals.

When I do take the time to reflect, I find that my own goals right now are not far off of those Anne Morrow Lindbergh set for herself when she was in mid-life: "Simplicity of living, as much as possible, to attain a true awareness of life. Balance of intellectual, physical and spiritual life. Work without pressure. Space for significance and beauty. Time for solitude and sharing." (p. 112)

If the Women's Narratives of Success Project helps Smith students and alumnae understand the shifting dimensions of success in their lives and reach toward a daily sense of well-being, I believe we will have made an important contribution.

16.12.11

Addiction

I'm addicted to period films. Especially, it seems, anything starring Romola Garai. I wonder how the poor woman got herself typecast in that role and how she deals with being told by casting directors that her appeal is more in the past than the present.

15.12.11

Awesome Psychobabble


Sometimes, I feel like the 20's are a sort of extended adolescence. You no longer are that person you were in "high school," but you haven't exactly left behind all the prejudices, prides and pitfalls of that phase of post-pubertal "emotional attyachar." That being said, 23 is a much better look for me - both emotionally and physically - than 14, 15 or even 17 was. These past 3 years, I've found myself moving forwards, towards the career and life I have always dreamt of, while at the same time, battling and laying to rest demons of the past.

When I was a teenager I always imagined myself to be sort of a citizen of the world, with no true home and wandering ways - contributing my supposed genius for the betterment of humanity on a whole. I attended, sequentially one of NJ's best public schools and Bangalore's best international school, was President of my school's Model United Nations club, played Western classical violin but listened to Lata Mangeshkar's Meera Bhajans and Led Zeppelin in my down time with equal love. I hated all things British (except Prince William and Harry Potter) and loved all things American, refused to wear "Indian clothes" unless there was a particular occasion, had dreams of becoming a UN diplomat/medical professional and had a an almost ostracizing hatred for anyone exhibiting signs of being a "popular kid" at school. So yes, I'd say I was a pretty well adjusted ABCD.

While I defined myself by my plurality and supposed intellect (let's be honest - I was and still am a total nerd through and through), the tight grip I had on this identity based on "openness and non-judgement" was about as false as it was a stranglehold on growing past the walls my assumed identity built around me. (Whoa! monster sentence. But I'm not going to change it. Decipher B*tches!) The past few years have forced me to confront situations and people that my previous identity would never have approved of. I've had to, like all of us do once past the privilege of childhood, get through disappointments and sorrow.

This doesn't always happen in large ways with fanfare and trumpets. Former anglophobic me now finds that the British are some of the most interesting people around. I actually enjoy their music, pop culture and yes, even the humor! I avoided all "dungeons and dragons" types like the plague, as I called gamers, in high school, but now, a sizable number of my crew embraces virtual reality over well, reality. And what about the desi angle, you may ask? Well, I've gone from a girl who didn't own a single salwar and scoffed at wearing "indian clothes" to her first day of college in Chennai, India to someone who can (sorta) rock a sari (*reminder to self: cross off bucket list*) and feels sometimes more comfortable in a salwar kameez. Now I'm sorry if all these supposedly life changing changes sound superficial and contrived, but honestly, it used to be these superficial and contrived things that defined my teenage identity. I suppose yes, that means that as a teenager I was somewhat superficial and contrived. Huh. And I thought I was a free thinking world citizen. Maybe those terrible teens are years where hormonal children try on everything bad or at least, most identifiably characteristic of an "adult" for size. Except it's all at once - hence the train wrecks.

All that being said, what I like about the 20's is that it gives me the opportunity to grow past the jingoism of my youth, the identity-brandishing abasement of things that were my opposite, into a little more settled, relaxed, embrace of who you really are and would like to be. You no longer feel the need to constantly prove and identify yourself to the world on a personal level (professionally, is another matter altogether), to shun "the others" who are not like you and to wear the Weezer T-shirt because god forbid people thing you're an N'Sync fan because you hang out with teeny boppers.

The twenties are sort of a decade of disabusement, or should be. It's a painful decade too because sometimes, hitting the reset button on beliefs you've held onto and people you have loved and trusted for a long time can be incredibly disturbing. I think I may have adult ADHD. Seriously.

Maybe it's just the natural progression of things. I mean, after all Prince William is both balding and married, the United Nations has failed to prevent yet another war and politically seems a bit of a banana republic, I've fallen prey entirely to the British invasion and they've given me a medical degree! I'd like to think that all human beings naturally progress from their teens into their twenties and that with the addition of a 2 to their age, comes a difference in the way they view the world. But when I look around me, and see the behavior of older adults around us - what with the hatred, intolerance, tunnel-vision and selfishness, I often wonder - what was their youth like?

Either way - this seems to be the decade that defines men and women for better or worse in the years to come. I suppose that regardless of what happens, I'm already me - that's my identity - and can just take it from there to wherever it is I want to go. As long as I can remain non-judgmental, open to new experiences and work a little harder, things will continue to look good.

:-)

PS - About the picture at the top of this entry. I don't know. I just like it. It reminds of hipsters. Who, by the way are about as horribly as un-twenty something and as close to teenagers as I can get. But I thought it was funny.